Regentide scores 5/100 in pepmg's criteria-based Vendor Score, which rates only what a vendor publishes about lab testing and about itself, not its products and not its prices. What we observed: COA documents published, none openable at the testing lab (0 of 1). The biggest credibility signal pepmg weighs is how a vendor publishes lab tests: pepmg catalogued COA documents on its site, but none of them open at a testing lab's own site and none name a lab pepmg could resolve, so a buyer can read the documents without being able to confirm them at the source. Neither price nor catalog size affects this score, but for context it prices about 1.6x the tracked median across the compounds it shares with other tracked vendors, over 37 tracked listings. Its prices are machine-readable, and the domain is newer, online since Sep 2025, which pepmg counts as neutral rather than a mark against it. This rates what Regentide publishes about lab testing and about itself, not the purity or authenticity of any vial, which pepmg can't verify, so read the COAs yourself. Research use only.

• Room to improve Publishes COA documents — no testing lab attributed

Are you the vendor? If you have changed something we score here, published something we did not find, or think we got it wrong, reach out or email hello@pepmg.com and we will re-check. Vendor corrections have already changed ratings on this site.