pepmg_

Methodology

Most comparison sites hide how they work. We publish it. Here's exactly how every number on pepmg is produced — and how to check us.

current index built 8m ago · 2026-09-30T10:32:12.895Z

▸ 0 · Why this site exists

You've used the other kind of price list. You know the moves:

None of that requires trusting us — every claim above is checkable on any row of the site. That's the whole idea.

▸ 1 · Collection — first-party, live-captured

Every price on this site is read directly from the vendor's own live store — the same public product feed their own storefront runs on — then cross-checked against a fresh fetch before publishing. No middlemen, no stale caches, no guesswork.

Why no "breadth" from third-party feeds? We tested an aggregated third-party dataset for wider vendor coverage and spot-checked it — the listings were stale and in some cases dead (a product still shown that the vendor no longer sells). A price index you can't trust is worse than a smaller one you can. So we removed it: if it's on pepmg, we pulled it live ourselves.

▸ 2 · Normalization (the hard part)

Raw vendor data is messy. We turn it into one comparable number — cost per milligram — and flag what shouldn't be compared head-to-head:

From 5639 raw listings this build, 3070 survive as clean, comparable, in-stock retail rows.

▸ 3 · Ranking (money can't move it)

Tables sort strictly ascending by $/mg. Bulk and outlier rows are de-emphasized and pushed below clean retail. No vendor can pay to move up. Where a link earns us a commission or carries a pepmg code, it's labeled on that row and ranked by the exact same math — the sort ignores who pays. See /disclosure.

▸ 4 · Continuous re-checking

A separate job re-fetches every first-party vendor on a schedule and compares the live price to what's published here. If a listing has gone dead or drifted, it's flagged for removal or refresh — so "captured 4h ago" stays true, not just true once. The whole index is also an open feed: /api/prices.json — every listing carries its vendor, source, fetch time, and the flags above.

▸ 5 · What the receipt proves — and what it doesn't

Being honest about our limits is the point. A pepmg row proves exactly one thing: this was the vendor's listed price for this product at the time and source shown. It does not prove:

If a number looks wrong, the receipts are right there — click the source, check the math, and tell us at hello@pepmg.com. We'd rather be corrected than wrong.

▸ 6 · Vendor longevity — domain ageHow long the vendor's website domain has existed — from public registration records and the Wayback Machine. It's the domain's age, not proof of how long the business has run.

Domain history provides context about a vendor’s website. It does not establish product quality or business legitimacy. For each vendor we collect two public facts:

We show the earlier of the two as a rough "online since" as a longevity signal about a source, shown on vendor profiles and kept separate from the Vendor Score. Two honest caveats: it is the domain's age, not proof of how long the business has run — an aged domain can be bought or a brand rebranded — and it is a weak signal, so we never treat it as a safety verdict. It has no effect on the $/mg ranking; price is the default sort, readers can also sort by Vendor Score, and no vendor can pay for placement.

All products listed are sold by third-party vendors for laboratory and research use only (RUO). Where an FDA label or a peer-reviewed study has published a dose, pepmg reports it with the source named, because that is safer than guessing. It is a report, not medical advice and not a recommendation to use anything. pepmg sells nothing and ships nothing. Listings are price-tracking data, not endorsements.