Study summary · research use only
Stem cell, Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor and/or Dihexa to promote limb function recovery in a rat sciatic nerve damage-repair model: Experimental animal studies
Plain-language summary
Paraphrased from the published abstract below — not a verdict on whether anything works.
This study in male Lewis rats used a sciatic nerve transection-repair model across 10 experimental groups (n = 6-8 rats/group) receiving mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), Dihexa, and/or vehicle, delivered locally, systemically, or to the gastrocnemius muscle, with limb sensory and motor function assessed at 1-2 week intervals for 16 weeks. Sensory function across peroneal, tibial, and sural nerve territories returned to near-normal (Grade 2.7 of 0-3) by 8 weeks overall; peroneal function recovered by one week (~2.0) while sural function recovered more slowly, by four weeks (~1.0). Motor function at 8-16 weeks, measured by walking foot print grades, significantly improved (P < 0.05) with MSC + G-CSF or MSC + Dihexa given into the gastrocnemius muscle, which was also linked to reduced foot flexion contractures.
Abstract
Optimizing nerve regeneration and re-innervation of target muscle/s is the key for improved functional recovery following peripheral nerve damage. We investigated whether administration of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC), Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) and/or Dihexa can improve recovery of limb function following peripheral nerve damage in rat sciatic nerve transection-repair model. There were 10 experimental groups (n = 6-8 rats/group). Bone marrow derived syngeneic MSCs (2 × 106; passage≤6), G-CSF (200-400 μg/kg b.wt.), Dihexa (2-4 mg/kg b.wt.) and/or Vehicle were administered to male Lewis rats locally via hydrogel at the site of nerve repair, systemically (i.v./i.p), and/or to gastrocnemius muscle. The limb sensory and motor functions were assessed at 1-2 week intervals post nerve repair until the study endpoint (16 weeks). The sensory function in all nerve boundaries (peroneal, tibial, sural) returned to nearly normal by 8 weeks (Grade 2.7 on a scale of Grade 0-3 [0 = No function; 3 = Normal function]) in all groups combined. The peroneal nerve function recovered quickly with return of function at one week (∼2.0) while sural nerve function recovered rather slowly at four weeks (∼1.0). Motor function at 8-16 weeks post-nerve repair as determined by walking foot print grades significantly (P < 0.05) improved with MSC + G-CSF or MSC + Dihexa administrations into gastrocnemius muscle and mitigated foot flexion contractures. These findings demonstrate MSC, G-CSF and Dihexa are promising candidates for adjunct therapies to promote limb functional recovery after surgical nerve repair, and have implications in peripheral nerve injury and limb transplantation. IACUC No.215064.
pepmg summarizes the peer-reviewed literature and links to every source — it sells nothing, ships nothing, and gives no medical, dosing, or human-use guidance. Don't just trust this summary: follow the citation to its source and read it yourself. Research use only.