pepmg_

Study summary · research use only

Safety and Efficacy of Cerebrolysin for Neurorecovery After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 14 Randomized Controlled Trials

Review · Cureus · 2025 · DOI 10.7759/cureus.91054 · PMID 41018475

Plain-language summary

Paraphrased from the published abstract below — not a verdict on whether anything works.

This systematic review and meta-analysis of Fourteen randomized controlled trials (2,884 patients) compared Cerebrolysin with placebo for neurological and functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke in humans, using the NIHSS as the primary outcome and assessing risk of bias with the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Pooled results showed a mean NIHSS change difference of +1.39 favoring Cerebrolysin (95% CI 0.53-2.25, p = 0.020). Functional independence (mRS 0-2) showed a non-significant trend favoring Cerebrolysin. No significant differences were found in serious adverse events, mortality, or hemorrhagic transformation. The authors describe these findings as showing enhanced early neurological recovery with Cerebrolysin and a comparable adverse-event profile, and call for further high-quality trials on long-term outcomes.

Abstract

Cerebrolysin, a neurotrophic compound, has been investigated as a neurorestorative therapy in acute ischemic stroke, although findings are inconsistent due to limitations in study inclusion and outcome reporting. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of Cerebrolysin in improving neurological and functional outcomes following acute ischemic stroke. Fourteen randomized controlled trials (N = 2,884 patients) comparing Cerebrolysin to placebo were included. The primary outcome was change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to follow-up, while secondary outcomes included functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2), serious adverse events (SAEs), mortality, and hemorrhagic transformation. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Pooled analysis showed that Cerebrolysin significantly improved neurological recovery (mean difference in NIHSS change: +1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-2.25; p = 0.020). Functional independence showed a non-significant trend in favor of Cerebrolysin (risk ratio (RR) = 1.31; 95% CI: 0.90-1.91; p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in SAEs (RR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.84-1.40), mortality (RR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.09), or hemorrhagic transformation (RR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.92). These findings suggest that Cerebrolysin significantly enhances early neurological recovery after ischemic stroke, with a comparable safety profile. Further high-quality trials are warranted to confirm its impact on long-term functional outcomes.

Read the full study on PubMed ↗ Open-access full text ↗

pepmg summarizes the peer-reviewed literature and links to every source — it sells nothing, ships nothing, and gives no medical, dosing, or human-use guidance. Don't just trust this summary: follow the citation to its source and read it yourself. Research use only.