pepmg_

Study summary · research use only

Immune enhancement in patients with predicted severe acute necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial

RCT · human · Intensive care medicine · 2022 · DOI 10.1007/s00134-022-06745-7 · PMID 35713670

Plain-language summary

Paraphrased from the published abstract below — not a verdict on whether anything works.

This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in human patients with predicted severe acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP) tested whether early Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1) treatment reduced infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). Patients with an APACHE II score ≥ 8 and CT severity score ≥ 5 received subcutaneous Tα1 1.6 mg every 12 h for 7 days then 1.6 mg once daily for 7 more days, or matching placebo. Of 508 randomised patients (254 Tα1, 254 placebo), 40/254 (15.7%) in the Tα1 group developed IPN versus 46/254 (18.1%) in the placebo group (difference -2.4% [95% CI -7.4 to 5.1%]; p = 0.48), with similar results across four predefined subgroups. The authors report Tα1 treatment did not reduce IPN incidence.

Abstract

Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a highly morbid complication of acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). Since there is evidence of early-onset immunosuppression in acute pancreatitis, immune enhancement may be a therapeutic option. This trial aimed to evaluate whether early immune-enhancing Thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1) treatment reduces the incidence of IPN in patients with predicted severe ANP. We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving ANP patients with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score ≥ 8 and a computed tomography (CT) severity score ≥ 5 admitted within 7 days of the advent of symptoms. Enrolled patients were assigned to receive a subcutaneous injection of Tα1 1.6 mg every 12 h for the first 7 days and 1.6 mg once a day for the subsequent 7 days or matching placebos (normal saline). The primary outcome was the development of IPN during the index admission. A total of 508 patients were randomised, of whom 254 were assigned to receive Tα1 and 254 placebo. The vast majority of the participants required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (479/508, 94.3%). During the index admission, 40/254(15.7%) patients in the Tα1 group developed IPN compared with 46/254 patients (18.1%) in the placebo group (difference -2.4% [95% CI - 7.4 to 5.1%]; p = 0.48). The results were similar across four predefined subgroups. There was no difference in other major complications, including new-onset organ failure (10.6% vs. 15%), bleeding (6.3% vs. 3.5%), and gastrointestinal fistula (2% vs. 2.4%). The immune-enhancing Tα1 treatment of patients with predicted severe ANP did not reduce the incidence of IPN during the index admission.

Read the full study on PubMed ↗ Open-access full text ↗

pepmg summarizes the peer-reviewed literature and links to every source — it sells nothing, ships nothing, and gives no medical, dosing, or human-use guidance. Don't just trust this summary: follow the citation to its source and read it yourself. Research use only.