pepmg_

Study summary · research use only

Two years of Denosumab and teriparatide administration in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (The DATA Extension Study): a randomized controlled trial

RCT · human · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2014 · DOI 10.1210/jc.2013-4440 · PMID 24517156

Plain-language summary

Paraphrased from the published abstract below — not a verdict on whether anything works.

In this randomized controlled trial extension (the DATA Extension Study), 94 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received teriparatide (20 microg daily), denosumab (60 mg every 6 months), or both for 24 months. The abstract reports that at 24 months lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) increased more in the combination group (12.9 +/- 5.0%) than the teriparatide (9.5 +/- 5.9%) or denosumab (8.3 +/- 3.4%) groups; femoral neck BMD increased more in the combination group (6.8 +/- 3.6%) than teriparatide (2.8 +/- 3.9%) or denosumab (4.1 +/- 3.8%); and total hip BMD increased more with combination (6.3 +/- 2.6%) than teriparatide or denosumab. Year-2 increases did not differ among groups.

Abstract

Current osteoporosis medications increase bone mineral density (BMD) modestly and reduce, but do not eliminate, fracture risk. Attempts to improve efficacy by administering anabolic agents and bisphosphonates concomitantly have been unsuccessful. Conversely, 12 months of concomitant denosumab and teriparatide therapy increases BMD more than either drug alone. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 24 months of combined denosumab and teriparatide will increase hip and spine BMD more than either individual agent. Preplanned continuation of the Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration (DATA) randomized controlled trial in which postmenopausal osteoporotic women received teriparatide (20 μg daily), denosumab (60 mg every 6 months), or both medications for 24 months. Participants were 94 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and distal radius BMD and serum markers of bone turnover were measured. At 24 months, lumbar spine BMD increased more in the combination group (12.9 ± 5.0%) than in either the teriparatide (9.5 ± 5.9%, P = .01) or denosumab (8.3 ± 3.4%, P = .008) groups. Femoral neck BMD also increased more in the combination group (6.8 ± 3.6%) than in either the teriparatide (2.8 ± 3.9%, P = .003) or denosumab (4.1 ± 3.8%, P = .008) groups. Similarly, total hip BMD increased more in the combination group (6.3 ± 2.6%) than in the teriparatide (2.0 ± 3.0%) or denosumab (3.2 ± 2.5%) groups (P < .001 for both). Although spine and hip BMD continued to increase in the second year in all groups, these year 2 increases did not differ among groups. Serum C-telopeptide and N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen were equally suppressed in the denosumab and combination groups, whereas osteocalcin decreased more in the denosumab group than in the combination group, a difference that persisted, but lessened, in the second year of therapy. Two years of concomitant teriparatide and denosumab therapy increases BMD more than therapy with either medication alone and more than has been reported with any current therapy. The combination of these agents may prove to be an important treatment option in patients at high risk of fracture.

Read the full study on PubMed ↗ Open-access full text ↗

pepmg summarizes the peer-reviewed literature and links to every source — it sells nothing, ships nothing, and gives no medical, dosing, or human-use guidance. Don't just trust this summary: follow the citation to its source and read it yourself. Research use only.