Study summary · research use only
A quantitative enterohepatic circulation model: development and evaluation with tesofensine and meloxicam
Plain-language summary
Paraphrased from the published abstract below — not a verdict on whether anything works.
In this human pharmacokinetic modelling study, the authors developed a quantitative enterohepatic circulation (EHC) model using intravenous data from tesofensine and meloxicam. Twenty-one healthy subjects received a single 6-hour infusion of tesofensine (0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2 mg), and twelve healthy subjects received meloxicam 30 mg intravenously alone or with cholestyramine. Tesofensine profiles were best described by a three-compartment model with first-order elimination, with bile release controlled by a sine function; meloxicam was best described by a four-compartment model with the sine function. The abstract reports that coadministration of cholestyramine resulted in a predicted 56% withdrawal of meloxicam from the EHC process, reducing the half-life from approximately 19 hours to approximately 12 hours. The authors describe the model as an in silico method to support an EHC hypothesis.
Abstract
Drugs undergoing enterohepatic circulation (EHC) are associated with typical pharmacokinetic characteristics such as multiple-peak phenomenon in the plasma concentration-time profile and prolongation of the apparent elimination half-life (t((1/2))). Currently, versatile pharmacokinetic models are lacking that could test the hypothesis of an EHC for observed multiple-peak phenomenon in pharmacokinetic profiles and its quantitative contribution. The aim of this analysis was to accomplish a model that is able to describe typical plasma concentration-time profiles of compounds undergoing EHC using data from intravenous studies of tesofensine and meloxicam. In addition, the developed model should be able to quantify the contribution of an EHC to the pharmacokinetics by determining the influence of interrupting the EHC of tesofensine and meloxicam to various extents. Two studies were investigated retrospectively for model development and model evaluation. Twenty-one healthy subjects received a single 6-hour infusion of tesofensine (0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2 mg) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single rising-dose study. Twelve healthy subjects were treated in a randomized, crossover study with meloxicam 30 mg as a single dose given intravenously (bolus) either alone or concomitantly with cholestyramine. The EHC model was developed based on data from the tesofensine study, where EHC is suspected. Model evaluation was performed with data from the meloxicam trial. Modelling and simulation analyses were performed using the software programs NONMEM, SAS and Berkeley Madonna. Plasma concentration-time profiles of tesofensine were best described by a three-compartment model (absorption, central and gallbladder) with first-order elimination. The release of the bile compartment was controlled by a sine function model, switching the bile compartment periodically on and off using the actual clock time as the control element. A four-compartment model (absorption, central, peripheral and gallbladder) with first-order elimination and the sine function for gallbladder control described the meloxicam data best. Coadministration of cholestyramine resulted in a predicted 56% withdrawal of meloxicam from the EHC process causing a reduction in the t((1/2)) from approximately 19 hours to approximately 12 hours. A quantitative EHC model was successfully developed that was capable of describing the multiple peaks in plasma concentration-time profiles of tesofensine and meloxicam very well. Additionally, the model successfully quantified the observed results for an interruption of the meloxicam EHC. The model offers an in silico method to support an EHC hypothesis using standard pharmacokinetic data and might help to guide dosing recommendations of compounds undergoing EHC.
pepmg summarizes the peer-reviewed literature and links to every source — it sells nothing, ships nothing, and gives no medical, dosing, or human-use guidance. Don't just trust this summary: follow the citation to its source and read it yourself. Research use only.